5 Comments
User's avatar
Chris's avatar

Relaxing authorization requirements and minimizing authorization delays is really only half of the problem with insurance companies. With or without authorization being required, insurance companies simply deny payment for a plethora of reasons even when authorization is granted. All payers are very clear that obtaining authorization is not a guarantee of payment. This needs to be addressed in tandem with simplifying and streamlining authorization.

MKBroker's avatar

This blog in particular has adopted differing views on authorizations. On one hand, authors support networks and authorizations as an important cost cutting measure to nudge patients to better quality, lower cost care at say, an outpatient surgery center rather than a hospital as part of their disintermediation series. On the other hand there are articles like this which are firmly against prior authorizations. Is the take that prior authorization is good in some cases and not others or only in moderation or what?

Erica's avatar

PA should go the way of the DoDo bird along with PBMs

Susananda's avatar

Again and again Republicans allow private for profit health insurance corporations to accept corporate welfare as they profit in the billions of dollars every quarter.

This public money is best given to Communities, providers and training.

Susananda's avatar

Republicans puppeteer is pre authorized by Christian Nationalists.

The U.S. is the only advanced nation without Universal Healthcare…. passing Medicare for all will save thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars and will prevent 500,000 medical bankruptcy every year.