4 Comments
User's avatar
Bruce Shutan's avatar

Hugh would be far better positioned to answer that question than me. But as a journalist, my own thinking is that the simplest answer is a long history of federal government inefficiency, endless red tape and incompetence, which is playing out in real time right now with DOGE. Consumers unfortunately have a choice between a status quo teeming with corporate greed and roadblocks or what I just described. I don't know the answer to this, but I sure do hope the experts figure this out.

Expand full comment
Bruce Shutan's avatar

Hugh's point was made within the context of conducting a site-of-care analysis to ensure that medical procedures could be done in the most cost-effective manner.

Expand full comment
MKBroker's avatar

While I'm not surprised a prior authorization requirement led to cost savings, I am a little surprised to hear prior authorizations mentioned in a positive light in Health Care Un-Covered given all of the past articles (especially in regards to medicare advantage) portraying them in a very negative light as a barrier to care.

Expand full comment
Susananda's avatar

Why not go to a single payer system that encompasses a single site of care approval approach.

Expand full comment