Shrink Greed, Not Medicaid: Why Cutting Care for 20 Million Is Wrong for America
Cut the greed, not the care — America’s health crisis isn’t Medicaid, it’s corporate profiteering.
Last month, the House passed a budget resolution that would cut health care spending by around $90 billion a year over the next decade. Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee will have to figure out details. We think most Americans would prefer to cut price-gouging and greed out of health care than people out of Medicaid.
As physicians with decades of clinical and health administration experience, we know that the U.S. spends too much money on health care. Since we graduated from medical school, the percentage of national spending on health care has more than tripled, to around 17%, twice the average of other prosperous countries where people live longer and healthier and have fewer administrative barriers to get care. We pay more and we get less.
Is cutting the number of Medicaid recipients the best way to reduce federal health care spending? Absolutely not. Medicaid is a program that improves health. For the young and poor, it provides “ounces of prevention” that reduce later spending on “pounds of expensive cure.” Pregnancy care prevents fetal deaths and life-altering complications. Senior care keeps the elderly as safe and healthy as possible in their waning years. We have personally cared for hundreds of patients whose health was improved and whose lives were changed by Medicaid.
Cuts to Medicaid could take coverage away from up to 20 million people, with devastating impacts on children, low-income workers, the elderly and their families. To cut tens of billions of dollars annually from health care spending without harming the health of Americans, we have to attack greed in health care - rampant price-gouging and profiteering.
Here are some ways to cut health care spending without causing fear, pain and lack of access to care.
Cut prices on more drugs now. Originally, some pharmacy benefit managers helped cut prices, but now PBMs mostly increase profits for their affiliated insurers. Americans should pay no more for medications than citizens of other prosperous countries.
Eliminate upcoding, or service code gaming in Medicare Advantage, which allows giant insurers to increase their profits.
Reduce misleading and inaccurate ads during the Medicare open enrollment period.
Decrease the allowable percentage of insurance revenues that go for “administration” instead of medical care from 15% to 10%.
A number of other recommendations can be found in a recent report by Dr. Don Berwick and colleagues.
These and other measures could help American health care come closer to becoming USA – Universal, Simple, Affordable. Many Republicans and Democrats understand that excessive complexity and unaffordability are the biggest problems in America’s health care today.
Sadly, the odds of success in attacking health care greed are low. Health care’s “special interests” – big insurance, big drug companies, big hospital systems, big medical associations – throw big money into politics through misleading advertisements, lobbying and campaign contributions. Their moneyed voices have more influence than the 20 million ordinary Americans threatened with the loss of Medicaid coverage.
Greed steals from need. People’s health and patient care are damaged by profit-oriented systems that promote complexity over simplicity. Major illnesses quickly and unexpectedly overwhelm family budgets, adding to the financial burden of millions of American families.
Shrinking Medicaid to expand tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy is a national disgrace. Billionaires do not need more tax cuts, but people on Medicaid depend on it for their health care. And if lawmakers want to take on the waste, fraud, and abuse in the health care system they should look at the big insurance companies that make billions in profits, not the vulnerable communities that depend on Medicaid. Save access to Medicaid for all who need it. Diminish greed in health care to reduce federal spending, decrease personal health care costs, and improve everyone’s health.
Dr. Ken Frisof is a retired family physician in Cleveland, Ohio, and a long-term health care justice advocate. Dr. Donald Lighter is a retired pediatrician and health care executive in Knoxville, Tennessee.
We need universal health care in the USA. We are the only industrialized nation without it. We have been lied to for generations. Universal health care is far cheaper, far faster, far better than corporate for-profit medicine which we have, which (Harvard study 2009) kills over 45,000 US citizens per year needlessly due to for-profit decisions rather than taking the patient's health into account. The actual damage is far worse including lives shortened and patients maimed for life while the oligarchs sit on their yachts and laugh at us.
Just as the maga-heads are starting to wake up and realize how the Trumpsters have lied to them, so they would hopefully soon wake up and understand that getting affordable, humane health care for themselves, their families, their children is the way to go. Wake up USA! Universal Health Care Now!
John T. Cullen JTC Sheep Heil!
johntcullen.substack.com
https://www.johntcullen.com
https://www.galleycity.com
(my 40+ books; bookstore
model (read half free/try-buy)
I completely agree regarding cutting corporate profiteering though I also believe that cuts across the board in the US healthcare system are needed. Physician wages are a part of that. As of 2021, the average physician earnings were ranked as follows:
"United States – $316,000
Germany – $183,000
United Kingdom – $138,000
France – $98,000
Italy – $70,000
Spain – $57,000
Brazil – $47,000
Mexico – $12,000
. . .
The average physician net worth (sum of all assets minus debts) was ranked as follows:
United States – $1,742,000
United Kingdom – $657,000
Germany – $441,000
France – $425,000
Italy – $269,000
Spain – $228,000
Brazil – $95,000
Mexico – $67,000"
Source: Bill Loguidice, Physicians Weekly, "How Do US Physician Salaries Compare With Those Abroad?". Sep 27, 2021
Even if we agree US physicians should make more due to the higher cost of training, it would clearly be more efficient/less costly to reduce the cost of training rather than pay 70% more in wages.
I highlight physician wages specifically because the authors or the article referenced are physicians, but the same can be said for the entire healthcare industry from insurance companies to long term care to pharmaceuticals, etc. The article referenced is unfortunately behind a paywall, but I would hope the authors agree.
From a commonwealth fund study comparing healthcare spending in the US to the average of 12 comparator OECD countries:
Component Share of excess spending
U.S. pays more in administrative costs of insurance ~15%
U.S. providers spend more on administrative activities ~15%
U.S. pays more for prescription drugs ~10%
U.S. physicians earn more ~10%
U.S. registered nurses earn more ~5%
U.S. invests more in medical machinery and equipment <5%
Sum of components estimated ~60%
Source: Ani Turner, George Miller, Elise Lowry, The Commonwealth Fund, "High U.S. Health Care Spending: Where Is It All Going?" October 4, 2023
Even if you could somehow cut the excess administrative costs and insurance down to 0 (unlikely!), you're still only cutting half of the 60% excess. The other 30% is in increased prescription drug costs, physician/nurse wages and higher equipment costs.